Issues[]
- The article is bullying Internet Explorer. Instead of saying that Internet Explorer has more holes than cheese everywhere, you can simply state that Internet Explorer is more dangerous to use than other browsers. And a reference on IE's vulnerabilities would be nice.
- The article is exaggerating. The article makes web browsers look like a dangerous bomb that should be removed from a computer. More explanation on browser vulnerabilities would be nice.
- Which web browsers? Which browsers provide a sandbox? And is that feature integrated to the browser or does it need to be downloaded?
- — Pikachurin - (Talk) (Contribs) 00:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- This is a wiki. If you see any way to improve the article, please directly edit it an do so, rather than waiting for me to read about what I "can simply state". References are always good, but isn't there already 3 references to what "security experts" say about Internet Explorer?
- This is the Computer Security wiki. I think each article on this wiki *should* point out all the dangerous bits of whatever it is we discuss. Please help us balance this by adding information to the article pointing out the benefits that are worth the risk, and by explaining how certain alleged vulnerabilities are mere misunderstandings.
- I've added a few more sentences about "sandbox" to the article; but I agree that a lot more could be said about them.
--DavidCary 21:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're right. :) I agree that Internet Explorer is dangerous, that's why I use Firefox. To make this article more neutral, I have added other web browser's security problems.
- — Pikachurin - (Talk) (Contribs) 23:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Missing[]
There should be a section on the following web browsers: Google Chrome, Safari, Opera, and maybe even Amazon Silk. --User000name (talk) 10:08, May 4, 2018 (UTC)